~/tedtes/writing/math-foundations-for-reasoning-models

~/writing/math-foundations-for-reasoning-models $ ls

Symbolic Logic and Reasoning

Negation of Quantified Statements

Negating a quantified statement switches universal claims to existential counterclaims, and existential claims to universal denials.

~/writing/math-foundations-for-reasoning-models $ cat topic.md

Negation of Quantified Statements

Definition

Negating a quantified statement changes what kind of claim is being made.

Universal statement:

For every x, P(x)

Negation:

There exists x such that NOT P(x)

Existential statement:

There exists x such that P(x)

Negation:

For every x, NOT P(x)

Negating a quantifier switches all to at least one counterexample, and existence to none.


Negating A Universal Statement

Statement:

For every x, P(x)

This says every case satisfies P.

To deny it, we only need one case that fails.

Negation:

There exists x such that NOT P(x)

Example:

For every x, x is even.

Negation:

There exists x such that x is not even.

The negation of "all" is "at least one not."


Negating An Existential Statement

Statement:

There exists x such that P(x)

This says at least one case satisfies P.

To deny it, every case must fail.

Negation:

For every x, NOT P(x)

Example:

There exists x such that x is even.

Negation:

For every x, x is not even.

The negation of "exists" is "all not."


Why Not Just Add NOT?

It is not enough to place NOT casually without changing the quantifier.

Incorrect pattern:

NOT for every x, P(x)

Clear equivalent:

There exists x such that NOT P(x)

The clear version explains what would make the original universal statement false.

Negation should expose the actual counterclaim.


Domain Still Matters

Negation depends on the same domain.

Statement:

For every x in {2, 4, 6}, x is even.

Negation:

There exists x in {2, 4, 6} such that x is not even.

The domain does not change.

Only the quantifier and predicate are negated.

Keep the same domain when negating quantified statements.


Final Summary

  • Negating a universal statement produces an existential counterexample.
  • For every x, P(x) becomes There exists x such that NOT P(x).
  • Negating an existential statement produces a universal denial.
  • There exists x such that P(x) becomes For every x, NOT P(x).
  • The domain stays the same.
  • Clear negation shows what would make the original statement false.

~/writing/math-foundations-for-reasoning-models $ open

Continue the series.

De Morgan's Laws